No. 20-7800

Jacqueline Moore v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-19
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP Experienced Counsel
Tags: appellate-review criminal-procedure fairness-standard federal-criminal-law indictment mens-rea plain-error-review rehaif-v-united-states supreme-court-decision trial-record
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. When applying plain error review based on an intervening United States Supreme Court decision, may an appellate court consider information outside the trial record to determine if the error affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the trial proceedings?

II. Does an indictment that omits the defendant's knowledge-of-status element fail to allege a federal offense?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether an appellate court may consider information outside the trial record to determine if a Rehaif error affected the fairness, integrity, or public reputation of the trial proceedings

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-28
Reply of petitioner Jacqueline Moore filed. (Distributed)
2021-05-19
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-04-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 19, 2021)

Attorneys

Jacqueline Moore
Amy B. ClearyFederal Public Defender, District of Nevada, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent