No. 20-7783
Michael A. Farrell v. Chris S. Buesgen, Warden
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process habeas-corpus lower-court-ruling perjured-testimony standing supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2021-06-17
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Are the lower court's rulings in direct conflict with Supreme Court precedent?
2. Did petitioner make a substantial showing he's in custody in violation of his Constitutional rights?
3. Was the denial of petitioners argument for "perjured Machner testimony" wrongfully denied and the use of this testimony in direct conflict with Supreme Court precedent?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Are the lower court's rulings in direct conflict with Supreme Court precedent?
Docket Entries
2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-04-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Michael A. Farrell
Michael A. Farrell — Petitioner