A Lontfove So Aaksiaa e Course o A 1963 Chvt pala hk acto as a Admintstrative Proceeding, « Poes ATH «Sets AG DSurksdicl on Xtend the Author! ty to Adfudivote, the matter so presented uilthln the bAhunal & Lt Pavel ¢ Hoes A Cow ck Ete By Sudgement sithar B a ay 2dtpalon an the, Me t+5 of Racks In oh alan RY Admint stratlye Proceeding Sp.oftstn a Ww lont roversy withla the couse Bedore the Court ®

T,. Havt stablish A Mecttorenus Consttuttonal Violate pond that the bi Ww, EK Lab hear ot the | eg indhen Presem | A dye uct d urhsdiotton to hoo Deltnatton ot A ott : Un Re, pond? a 0 mirovyee u Ptyvote Securl NOAwy Ene bem En 2d to Qualdtted Lo indty @

TL. A petition whom Piles @ ctvtlRtghts Complaint fursuant to HAUSC 41983 + o xcesdtve dor e + Heltberute ath te CACR + Dental t A Cao) VO beagl 0 etal ad Subsequently Released trom tustedy Joes 42u S49 ]eta) exhaustion kequs LMen Bor Rellet: then fetoner Attemots to tle Cycle eo, trom 7 olat To ¢

Whether a 1963 civil rights action can be treated as an administrative proceeding, whether a court has jurisdiction to adjudicate the matter presented within the tribunal, whether a court can enter a final judgment rather than remand for further administrative proceedings, whether a court has established a meritorious constitutional violation, whether a court has jurisdiction to appoint counsel, whether a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983 requires exhaustion of administrative remedies before filing