Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit created an 1.
intra-circuit and inter-circuit split by wrongly deciding that the District
Court did not abuse its discretion when it imposed expert report exclusion
sanction on Plaintiff for Plaintiff expert report that was untimely (two (2)
months untimely but one (1) month and twenty-one (21) days before the end
of discovery) and not excluding Defendants expert report that was untimely
(three (3) months untimely and twenty (20) days after the end of discovery);
even though both Plaintiff and Defendants argued harmlessness or
justification at the District Court and the District Court conducted no
Daubert or any expert or expert report admissibility hearing or evaluation
(on Plaintiffs expert and his report or the Defendants four (4) experts and
their reports).

Whether a reversible error occurred when the District Court issued a decision 2.
without considering a relevant motion before issuing the decision.

Whether the Federal District Court needed to get a certification from the 3.
Michigan Supreme Court before it could allow two Defendants to remove a
case from a Michigan State Court because a motion for reconsideration on
seven dismissed Defendants in the case was pending before the Michigan
State Court.

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit created a 4.
split with the U.S. Supreme Court and intra-circuit split when it wrongly
decided that a motion for sanction directed at some collateral issues can be
mooted if the motion relates to merits issues; even if the motion is not asking
for relief on merits issues.

Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit created an intra-circuit and inter-circuit split by wrongly deciding that the District Court did not abuse its discretion when it imposed expert report exclusion sanction on Plaintiff