No. 20-7768

Byron L. Hagans v. Mark Brnovich, Attorney General of Arizona, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-15
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: criminal-procedure due-process fair-trial fourteenth-amendment habeas-corpus sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does it violate a defendant's Fifth, Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional rights to be present at trial when he is not informed of the constitutional calls he will be read bias when he does fight for a fundamentally fair trial by having his trial in absentia?

Has the United States Supreme Court's ruling in Crosby and Fed. & Crim. P.43 clearly established federal law for the purpose of a Writ of Habeas Corpus (28 U.S.C. § 2254)?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the petitioner's Sixth and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional rights were violated when he was tried in absentia without being informed of the constitutional claims he would be facing

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-01-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)

Attorneys

Byron L. Hagans
Byron L. Hagans — Petitioner