Jamil Stefon Carter v. O'Bell T. Winn, Warden
Ground Ona:
DUE PROCESS REQUIRES PLEA WITHDRAWAL WHERE PETITIONER DID NOT KNOW HIS GUILTY
PLEA WAIVED HIS RIGHT TO APPEAL THE DENIAL OF THE PRE-TRIAL MOTION TO SUPPRESS PETITIONER'S STATEMENT TO A DETECTIVE AND WHERE PETITIONER WAS FRIGHTENED
INTO PLEADING GULTY BY DEFENSE COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO ASK THE QUESTIONS
PETITIONER WANTED PUT TO THE POTENTIAL JURORS DURING SELECTION AND PETITIONER FELT DEFENSE TRIAL COUNSEL HAD LOST INTEREST IN THE CASE. U.S. CONST. AMS VT# XTV.
Ground Two:
DUE PROCESS REQUIRES PLEA WITHDRAWAL WHERE 'TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INFORM
'THE TRIAL COURT THAT PETITIONER HAD INFORMED COUNSEL THAT THE CONFESSION
HE MADE TO DETECTIVE JOHNELL WHITE WAS COMPLETELY FALSE.
TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INFORM PETITIONER OF LESSER RELATED OFFENSES IN
REGARDS TO THE ORIGINAL CHARGES.
•TRIAL COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO FOLLOW THROUGH WITH THE TRIAL COURT DECISION
FOLLOWING PETITIONER'S MOTION TO FIND OUT THE TRUE IDENTITY OF THE PROSECUTION
WITNESS LORENZO PETRIS.
TRIM, COUNSEL'S FAILURE TO INFORM PETITIONER THAT HIS GUILTY PLEA WOULD WAIVE
HIS BRIGHT TO APPEAL THE PRE-TRIAL MOTION TO A POLYGRAPH EXAM.
COUNSEL'S USE OF COERCION WHERE PETITIONER EXPRESSED RELUCTANCE DURING
PLEA PROCEEDINGS.
ALL THE ABOVE SHOULD BE CONSTITUTE INEFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL. U.S.
CONST. AMS VI, XIV.TRL
Whether due process requires plea withdrawal where the petitioner was unaware that his guilty plea waived his right to appeal the denial of a pre-trial motion to suppress, was frightened into pleading guilty by defense counsel's failure to ask questions of potential jurors, and felt defense counsel had lost interest in the case