Did the Honorable Federal District Court violate the Federal District [due process rights] embedded in the 5th and 14th Amendment of the United States Constitution as well as the (4th, 6th, 8th, 10th) Amendment Rights of the U.S. Constitution when the honorable Federal District Court allowed the United States of America to use the petitioner Mr. Myles state transcript/proceedings as state evidence, in Federal District Court as well as they are at liberty to do, yet refused to give the prior state Court Rulings embedded in State Transcripts to 28 USC 1738 in Federal District Court?

Do The Honorable Federal District Court have to follow the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals Order/mandate on February 21st 2019 by the sixth circuit on case #17-3817 (pa 4) when the honorable appellate Court gave the case (order/mandate) that Under the doctrine of res judicata, Federal Courts (must) give the same (preclusive effect) to State Court Judgements in the courts of the rendering state as they would receive (See Exhibit A/page 4)?

Whether the federal district court violated the Due Process Clause by failing to allow the petitioner to fully litigate his claims