No. 20-7735
IFP
Tags: advocacy-appearance constitutional-challenge due-process evidentiary-breach evidentiary-issues fair-trial ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel judicial-bias judicial-impartiality prosecutorial-misconduct trial-court-discretion
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-10
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. Did the trial court's questioning of multiple witnesses that essentially advocated strengthen the prosecution's and pierce the veil of Case judicial importiality demonstrate th trial partiality the prosecation and improperl y court's toward inflience the jury by creating an and partiality Petitioner? In the alternative, was against defense counsel court's highl prejudicial and irrelevant evidence regarding an alleged threat to Ms. Brunsun by Petitioner follswing the shooting incident with Mr. Tisdale?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the trial court reversibly erred in admitting highly prejudicial and irrelevant evidence related to an alleged threat to Ms. Branson by Petitioner following the shooting incident with Mr. Tisdale
Docket Entries
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-26
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-01-04
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 14, 2021)
Attorneys
DeAndre Harris
DeAndre Harris — Petitioner