I. DID THE DECISION OF THE COURTS APPEALS THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ERR WHEN CONCLUDING THAT DAVIS NOWAK'S GOAL OF FURTHERING OR FACILITATING THE CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE WAS SATISFIED?

II. DID THE DECISION OF THE APPEALS IN THE SIXTH CIRCUIT COURT ERR CONCLUDING THAT DAVIS WAS PRIMARILY FORESEEABLE TO PAYS WAYS ON THE DISTRICT COURT PROP ESTIMATE WHICH CLEARLY EVIDENCED ITS FINDING LOSS THE ENTIRE CONSPIRACY CONDUCT WITH DRUG AMOUNT?

IV. DID THE DECISION OF THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT FURTHER ONLY HOLDING THE FACT THAT DAVIS EITHER MANNER RIGHTS WAS HOLDING UPON PROCESS AND DOUBLE JEOPARDY?

Did the decision of the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit err when concluding that Davis adopted the goal of furthering or facilitating the criminal endeavor