No. 20-7716
Milton Mosley v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: civil-rights criminal-procedure fourth-amendment law-enforcement probable-cause reasonable-suspicion search-and-seizure terry-stop terry-v-ohio
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
The finding of the lower courts, where suspicion of criminal activity was clearly not "specific, individualized, and reasonable," is contrary to the Supreme Court's decision in Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the lower courts' finding that suspicion of criminal activity was not 'specific, individualized, and reasonable' is contrary to Terry v. Ohio
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2020-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Milton Mosley
Michael Oresto Palermo Jr. — Palermo Law Offices, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent