No. 20-7693
Keenan G. Wilkins, aka Nerrah Brown v. C. Joksch, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-1915 appellate-jurisdiction civil-procedure civil-rights due-process in-forma-pauperis indigent-appeal pro-se-litigant standing three-strikes
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Is a prisoner who is found to have THREE STRIKES pursuant to 28 UCS 1915 entitled to a ONE TIME appeal on the merits of this finding?
2. Does the Court of Appeal have jurisdiction to DECIDE an appeal BEFORE grahting/denying an indigent Appellants Rule 24 request for In Forma Pauperis status?
3. Were Petitioner's appeal for the District Court's dismissal of his ENTIRE complaint for Misjoinder a FRIVILOUS appeal?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Is a prisoner who is found to have three strikes pursuant to 28 USC 1915 entitled to a one-time appeal on the merits of this finding?
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied, and the petition for a writ of certiorari is dismissed. See Rule 39.8.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-26
Waiver of right of respondent C. Joksch to respond filed.
2021-04-20
Waiver of right of respondent F. Foulk to respond filed.
2021-03-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 10, 2021)
Attorneys
C. Joksch
Gabrielle DeSantis Nield — Nield Law Group APC, Respondent
F. Foulk
Keenan G. Wilkins
Keenan G. Wilkins — Petitioner