Mr. Washington (Petitioner) alleged that the CCL Court lack subject matter jurisdiction to try him. Petitioner was convicted, in large part upon Plain Error federal Rule of Evidence Rule 1046. The Commonwealth's (Com) witness testified that he could not verify that Petitioner received a picture law of Picer searched the so called crime Scene (CTE N95, 196) Petitioner's residence. The Fourth Circuit relied upon a technic olitu be ianitico Misstoted Even the slanted version of the Fock. The lip of trots shalt be established Forever: Did the Fourth Circuit err in overlooking the truth Foc a techn: colitu in deferring to We Com. to the Finding that Petitioner Was not prejudiced lou She Court not hang Si slo ees matter ? sei Sdvction (CS M3) to Con viet when the Fourth Circuit decision was based on a Flaara mis reading oF

Whether the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to try the petitioner