1. DID THE ALABAMA CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS ISSUE A "BLANKED JUDGEMENT" COVERING UP A CRIME COMMITTED BY PRESIDING JUDGE, MARY B. WINDOM OF THE ALABAMA CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS WITH THE RECORD?

2. DID THE ALABAMA SUPREME COURT JUDGES VIOLATE THE PETITIONER'S DUTY TO TAKE "EX MERO MOTU ACTION" ON FACTS THAT APPEARED AFFIRMATIVELY ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD?

3. DID ALABAMA CRIMINAL COURT PRESIDING JUDGE MARY B. WINDOM COMMIT THE CRIME OF "FRAUD" WHEN SHE "CONVEYED MATERIAL FACT WHICH WAS CRUCIAL EVIDENCE IN FAVOR OF THE PETITIONER"?

4. DID THE ALABAMA CRIMINAL COURT OF APPEALS VIOLATE JUDGES' PETITIONER'S UNITED STATES CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS WHEN THEY ABANDONED THEIR DUTY TO TAKE "EX MERO MOTU ACTION" ON FACTS THAT APPEARED AFFIRMATIVELY ON THE FACE OF THE RECORD?

5. ALABAMA SUPREME COURT JUDGES SHOULD TERMINATE A PLEA, RECORDING THE PROCEEDINGS, AND ALABAMA RULES OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, RULE 1.4, GUIDANCE OF GUILTY PLEA, LEXIS (8) COLLOQUY WITH DEFENDANT(S) OF PROCEEDINGS.

Whether the Alabama Supreme Court violated the Sixth Amendment's right to a fair trial and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by denying the petitioner's request for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence of innocence