No. 20-7666
Willie Ponder v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Tags: 28-usc-2253 28-usc-2254 actual-innocence certificate-of-appealability confrontation-clause due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel
Latest Conference:
2021-06-03
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) on his claim that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to properly object to testimony referring to the "word on the street" identifying the Petitioner as the shooter – testimony that violated the Petitioner's Confrontation Clause rights.
2. Whether a freestanding claim of actual innocence is cognizable in a 28 U.S.C. § 2254 proceeding.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability
Docket Entries
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent Florida to respond filed.
2021-04-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 6, 2021)
Attorneys
Florida
William Earl Ponder
Michael Robert Ufferman — Michael Ufferman Law Firm, P.A., Petitioner