1. How did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit disregard
and ignore the facts and factual evidence, and prohibition criteria, which require
magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne 's disqualification, and make its decision in conflict
with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision, Liljeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition
Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 860 (1988)?

2. May magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne knowingly abuse her discretion to cover
and protect Respondent and Respondent counsels ' guilt and crime in perjury and
falsifying documents, and contempt and copyright infringement without
disqualifying?

3. May magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne knowingly usurp judicial authority to rule
on Petitioner 's motions (Dkt. Nos. 34, 89) and issue temporary restraining order
(Dkt. No. 95) and preliminary injunctions (See APPENDIX "B", all, al3) without
or in excess of her jurisdictions and authority without disqualifying?

4. Whether Respondent and Respondent counsels ' nefarious deeds in perjury and
falsifying documents, contempt and copyright infringement may be knowingly
protected by federal judges, who are unaccountable for their misconduct under the
pretext of judicial rulings?

How did the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit disregard and ignore the facts and factual evidence, and prohibition criteria, which require magistrate judge Jodi F. Jayne's disqualification, and make its decision in conflict with the U.S. Supreme Court's decision, Lifjeberg v. Health Servs. Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 860 (1988)?