1. WHETHER TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE FOR FAILING TO DEFECT TO TNE TESTIMONY OF TNE STATE'S WITNESS WHEN SHE TEST/f/ED TO TNE FREquENCY ORGASMS OCCUR SEN RARE VICTIMS DURING AN ATTACK

2. WHETHER TRIAL COUNSEL WAS INEFFECT/VE For failing to call gather , ttackson and PRECIOUS H/cKS as WITNESSES AT TR/AL (eyewitnesses and alibi witnesses )

3. WHETHER FLORIDA STATUTE § 7?H 00.3. (/) IS UN CONST! TUT/ONAL AS IT SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT A DEFENDANT CAN BE CO/VV/ ctED SOLELY ON AN UNCORROBORATED statement / TEST/ mon Y IN sexual Battery CASES IN VIOL at/on of the / -y*jj S5'- f iv~ Amendments to the u, s. CON ST/TUT/ONAL

Whether trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the testimony of the state's witness when she testified to the frequency of orgasms occur in rape victims during an attack