1. Whether, in accordance with this Court's directive regarding the interpretation of due process and equal protection, the trial court's awarded judgment against the Petitioner was founded on legal error and/or (prejudice) judicial misconduct after applying two separate standards of care for two separate litigants requesting identical relief; allowing due process and equal protection for one who is White and disallowing due process and equal protection to the other who is Black.

2. Whether the Petitioner had a liberty interest in the fair administration of justice and the right to procedural due process under law, free of discrimination and retaliation.

3. Whether, based on the evidence and by listing and weighing a series of factors which in totality showed invidious discrimination, the trial court's actions amounted to a relentless effort to exclude the Petitioner from having his case transferred and/or presided over in alignment with California law and both state and federal constitutions.

Whether the trial court's awarded judgment against the Petitioner was founded on legal error and/or judicial misconduct after applying two separate standards of care for two separate litigants requesting identical relief