No. 20-7633

Sam Sterling Alford v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-01
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 28-usc-2253c certificate-of-appealability consolidation consolidation-risks counsel-performance criminal-procedure ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel informed-consent right-to-counsel
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28 U.S.C. §2253(c) on his claim that his counsel rendered ineffective assistance of counsel by failing to advise defendant of the risks associated with consolidation, which deprived defendant the right to give informed consent regarding consolidation?

Whether a criminal defendant is denied his right to effective assistance of counsel when a defendant's consent to a course of action against prevailing state and federal law is obtained where counsel acknowledges failing to advise of the risks?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the court of appeals improperly denied the Petitioner a certificate of appealability under 28-U.S.C-2253(c) on his claim that his counsel rendered ineffective-assistance-of-counsel by failing to advise defendant of the risks associated with consolidation, which deprived defendant the right to give informed-consent regarding consolidation?

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-13
Waiver of right of respondent State of Florida to respond filed.
2021-03-27
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due May 3, 2021)

Attorneys

Sam Sterling Alford
Sam Sterling Alford — Petitioner
State of Florida
Trisha Meggs PateOffice of the Attorney General Criminal Appeals Division Tallahassee, Respondent