No. 20-7611

Jamar Garrison v. United States

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-30
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: brady-rule brady-violation constitutional-rights criminal-procedure discovery-obligations due-process harmless-error rule-16 sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-06-24
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. Should a Writ of Certiorari Issue to Revi ew the Brady and Rule 1 6 Due
Process Viol ations in Defendant's Case Because the Sixth Ci rcuit
Found No Error or Harmless Err or in the Gov ernment's Viol ations of
its Di scovery Obli gations?

II. Should a Writ of Certiorari Issue Because the Sixth Ci rcuit Denied
Defendant's Due Process Right to a Fair Tria l When i t Found No Error
in the G overnment's Use of Fal se Testimony?

III.Should a Writ of Certiorari Issue Because Defend ant wa s Denied His
5 and 6 Amendment Rights to P resent a Defense When the Sixthth th
Circuit Affirmed the District Court' s Refus al to Permi t Defendant to
Cros s-Examine Bull ington Regarding Specific Instances of Conduc t?

IV. Should a Writ of Certiorari Issue to Vacate a s Reha if Plain Err or
Defendant's Convicti on and Sentence as an Armed Career Cr iminal?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

should-a-writ-of-certiorari-issue-to-review-the-brady-and-rule-16-due-process-violations

Docket Entries

2021-06-28
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/24/2021.
2021-05-26
Memorandum of respondent United States filed.
2021-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including May 28, 2021.
2021-04-23
Motion to extend the time to file a response from April 29, 2021 to May 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 29, 2021)

Attorneys

Jamar Garrison
Margaret Sind RabenGurewitz & Raben, PLC, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent