1. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION SUSTAINING/AFFIRMING THE DISTRICT COURT'S ORDER BECAUSE NO SUBSTANTIAL QUESTION WAS PRESENTED BY PETITIONER RODRIGUEZ'S APPEAL

2. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN DISMISSING PLAINTIFF V. BRISBEN'S APPEAL PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. §243 (5)(e) (2-B(5)); OR SUMMARY JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO THIRD CIRCUIT LAW 27-11/4MB I-A, P. 40-10

3. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN DENYING THE DISTRICT COURT PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ'S MOTIONS AND DID NOT SUBMIT A BASES FOR FILED PRETRIAL MOTIONS IN CASE NO. 2-8650 HO HO HO

4. DID THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN UPHOLDING THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE AND THE DISTRICT JUDGE'S STATEMENT THAT THE DEFENDANTS WERE FULLY IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS OF THE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

5. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN ASSESSING WHEN THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE THAT PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ WAS GIVEN AN OPPORTUNITY TO FULLY PRESENT HIS ARGUMENTS AT THE NOVEMBER CONFERENCE

6. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE DISCRETION IN FAILING TO ADDRESS PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ'S GRIEVANCES OF FILE AND DESCRIPTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT WHERE MAGISTRATE JUDGE IMPOSED DENIED AND DISTRICT JUDGE UPHELD

7. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN FAILING TO ADDRESS PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ'S GRIEVANCES AS TO WHY HE HAD FILED A MOTION TO RE-OPEN HIS CASE

8. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN FAILING TO ADDRESS PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ'S AGAIN HAS HIS PENDING MOTION FOR COMPETENT COUNSEL WHERE MAGISTRATE JUDGE IMPOSED AND DISTRICT JUDGE UPHELD WITHOUT A PROPER HEARING TO DETERMINE IF PLAINTIFF'S COUNSEL WAS INEFFECTIVE IN HIS REPRESENTATION

9. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN FAILURE TO ADDRESS WHY THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE DENIED PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ'S MOTION TO APPOINT COMPETENT COUNSEL INTERPOLATE A HEARING TO DETERMINE YES/NO FOR APPOINTMENT COUNSEL IN ALLEGATIONS OF INEFFECTIVE REPRESENTATION

10. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN FAILING TO ADDRESS THE GRIEVANCES WITHIN IMPP OPBPL WHERE FORMER PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ, THAT ANY NEW CIVIL SUITS MUST BE BROUGHT IN A NEW LAWSUIT AND FROM THE DISTRICT JUDGE FAILED TO ADDRESS THIS ISSUE

11. DID THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ABUSE ITS DISCRETION IN FAILING TO ADDRESS THE GRIEVANCES WITHIN PLAINTIFF RODRIGUEZ WAS PREVENTED TO PURCHASE HIS TWO FEDERAL SAVINGS CERTIFICATES GRISSAM FLEXUS BEADED NECKLACES DUE

Whether the Third Circuit Court of Appeals abused its discretion in summarily affirming the district court's order, dismissing plaintiff Rodriguez's appeal, and agreeing with the magistrate judge and district judge on various issues