No. 20-76

Ghassan Hage v. Fida Mhanna

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2020-07-27
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure contempt-of-court due-process judicial-discretion judicial-procedure
Key Terms:
Environmental
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (from Petition)

(l) Where Judge of the Superior Court violated a Court Order issued by a previous Judge (Appendix "D" p. 23a), (2) where Lawyer from State Bar of California violated a Court Order issued in his presence by a previous Judge (Appendix "D"), (3) where Judge of the Superior Court violated his own department long cause and trial policies(Appendix "E" p. 25a), (4) where Lawyer from State Bar of California violated Superior Court long cause and trial policies handed to him in the Superior Court Department by the same Judge who violated his own department trial policies (Appendix "E"), and (5) where the right of a fair trial under the constitution for the Petitioner to be prepared to defend himself was violated by given him 33 Exhibits on the morning of the trial instead at least 5 days before the trial as per Superior Court trial policies ( Appendix "E") and at least 10 days before the trial as per a previous Judge order (Appendix "D"), under what circumstances do a Judge and a lawyer can be above the Law in the Superior Court of California while the Appeal Court of California turned its blind eye on this double violation of the Law by he Judge and the lawyer in a conspiracy way . The CA Supreme Court turned its blind eye too on this violation of the LAW by the Judge and the Lawyer.

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the lower court erred in its ruling despite a prior court order

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-07-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 26, 2020)

Attorneys

Ghassan Hage
Ghassan Hage — Petitioner