1. Did the Fifth Circuit err in finding that jurists of reason could not have found it debatable that the district court erred by dismissing Petitioner's Petition for A Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In State Custody Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241, 2254, with prejudice without it considering Petitioner's timely Motion to Amend His Petition pursuant to Rule 15, F.R.C.P ?

2. Did the Fifth Circuit err by not finding jurists of reason could not have found it debatable that the district court erred by upholding the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decision that trial counsel was not ineffective?

3. Did the Fifth Circuit err by finding jurists of reason could not find it debatable that the district court erred by upholding the state intermediate court of appeals decision to affirm Petitioner's judgment and sentence with a finding that appellate counsel was not ineffective?

4. Did the Fifth Circuit err by finding jurists of reason could have not found it debatable that the district court erred by holding the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals decision that the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying Petitioner's motion to suppress, denying his motion for a mistrial, overruling Petitioner's objections thereto, and allowing the admission of unauthenticated crime scene photos.

Did the federal district court err in dismissing the habeas petition without considering the petitioner's motion to amend