No. 20-7590
IFP
Tags: burden-of-proof civil-liberties constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process equal-protection evidence habeas-corpus judicial-review legal-procedure statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2021-05-27
Question Presented (from Petition)
I. IS AN pro-sELitiaANT eNtitIEb to relcive
CourT procecdinqs
NO NO INDONNNUbND OO
21
violatetheeiqth AmevomeNt
3
ON A ACTUAL FALTWALINNOCENCE CLAIM
4. ISA STATE COWRT BOUNd bYANDMUST FOLLOW
5. CANASTATE CONTT KEEF AINNOCENT PERSON
From coNclnsively proviNgTheir iNnoceNce
bY dENiNg ThAT PErsoN DUE-ProcESS
OOCSAWrONGFUIlY CONUICTEd PErSON hAUEA
6o
riqhT to coNclnsivelY Provetheir ActhAl
iNNocewce throngn ONA poRensictEStiNg
DO OKIAhOMA COURTS hAVE TOANdArErEQUITEd
7,
tO FOLlOW ANY LAWS WHATSOEUER
DOCS ANACTWALiNNOCENCE CLAIM WARRANT
8.
AN iNvestigatiON into that persoN's Actual
iNNoteNCE
DOES KEEPING ANACTWANYINNOLENT PERSON
91
iN priSON SCrVEANYpUbLiCiNtEtEST
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Question not identified
Docket Entries
2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-12
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-03-23
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Billy E. Parker
Billy Earl Parker — Petitioner