No. 20-7580
Trinidad Jesus Garcia v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review civil-procedure criminal-procedure due-process federal-sentencing individualized-circumstances judicial-discretion plain-error reasonableness sentencing sentencing-guidelines
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
whether Formal objection after pronouncement of Sentence is necessary to invoke appellate review of Sentence (Ground Four) and Sentence Prejudice the Defendant. (Ground Five) And increase Base level.
Was there Sufficient Evidence presented to show intent to distribute (Ground Three)
Should 841(b) only have been Charged
Did any of the other grounds prejudice the defendant.
Do any of the Grounds conflict with other circuits (Ground Three) or (Ground six) Relevant Conduct issue
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether formal objection to sentencing is necessary to invoke plain error review of the reasonableness of a sentence
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-03-31
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-01-22
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Trinidad Jesus Garcia
Trinidad J. Garcia — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent