Rymer's state trial violated,Inef. Ass't. of Counsels '/Government by Due Process Cl.

1 Deprived of 6th amdt. attached counsel right by S.P.D. Kuech, Br.II froze assets
9/30/97 96FA228 by ACCUSER (Sila V. U.S.) then DECIDER 97CF396/96FA228 their FIDUCI
ARY violated 28 U.S.C.§455(b) (Fowler V. Butfs/Gittere V. EchaKarria/Williams V. Pa.).

2 COVERT: Simultaneous Actual Conflict of Interest Dr. M.J. Chambliss 1996-99 with
trial att'y. F.M. Gimbel (Cuyler V. Sullivan) Gimbel got My $5K for autopsy^not done

3 CONFRONT: (Brady-Napue-and progeny) Government /i.A.C.s suppressed/wrongfully with
held (Brady V. Maryland/Cone V. Bell) see exhibits A-Z, missing 1-22, and l-55=proof.

4 Deliberate Elicitation: (John J. Fellers V. U.S. and progeny)6th amdt. counsel right.

5 Rymer's ALIBI-TIMELINE at trial by Dr. Chambliss on T.O.D. and Kramer's testimony
on 9/19-20/97 Friday till his arrest Sat. 9/20 at 18:03 Hr. Fond du Lac Police (FdL) .

6 Failure of IACs to develope and investigate, strategy, conflict loyalty by 3 att'ys.
(Crane V. Ky,/Holmes V. S.C. ) lied about CCAP/WCCA records on Chambliss-Gimbel 1996-99.

7 Rymer's right to Open/Public Trial closed 4/22 PM-4/23/98 AM jury conference and
jury instructions (I at jail=N0T OBJECT) Gimbel not object=NOT RECORDED on Sudden Passion/
on proof Gail alone came back uninvited=broke in 18:00.

8 Br.II lost competency/personal subject-matter jurisdiction (see #l)lost authority.

9 F.d.L. Police Sat. 9/20/97 18:03 Hr. violated Rymer's 4th amdt. privacy right, NO:
charge with 4 pistols to his head=inside CONDO.

10 Rymer's 18 U.S.C. §3005 2nd trial att'y. and witnesses (see #2) My $5K=NO EXPERTS ,
6th amdt. right of accused to confront witnesses before jury (exhibits on #97-10298)

11 Due Process Clause violated not fair trial, INADMISSABLE EVIDENCE For. DEntist Dr.
L. Thomas Johnson, surprise witness (NO Pre-Trial)CG photos=bite-mark(Ege V. Yukins),
OBJECTION by Gimbel not getting 14 photos/negatives(see Johnson's lies=Robert Lee

Whether Rymer's state trial violated his right to effective assistance of counsel and due process under the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments