No. 20-7572
Jim Bass Holden v. Nevada, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 6th-amendment appellate-review circuit-split conflict-of-laws constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process federal-jurisdiction judicial-discretion procedural-default right-to-counsel
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities
SocialSecurity Securities
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
ao\ <x v/\oWo on S»)^VvI.tOWAbec cr
dLrnortV c\^aV \o Cocuis^A c^s Acf » ^>y
fW^SkAn £>CCceA u^W ia AW SWc tfsdc We,Amen
^U^sVYvwet'TV /'havwc Ac i ctf rV 3\a£<n Wll ? sOr^Acvi/'i
W 4Uere- \s AW ociWvce of a £u>Ue4Wf
£bwCVici- b<Woe£A 4Uo decks' ion of uA/ucL <revk£^
\s socgVvb AWct* oW> Ws <xc>c
ifVsA to nal i wA^<3Lcrlr *7
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the use of a Brecon ment / wmnte wukecwautt Seven s\\k ¢ QQ violates the Sixth Amendment right to counsel
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-12
Waiver of right of respondent Nevada, et al. to respond filed.
2021-03-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Jim Bass Holden
Jim Bass Holden — Petitioner
Nevada, et al.
Heather Diane Procter — Respondent