1. Is an objection required before a court would have understanding that a detainee did not want to be tried after the time-line set in his involuntary removal initiated under article IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act?

2. Would it be abuse of discretion if a court over looked a specific relevant law before making it's decision?

3. What constitutes a waiver?

4. Can faulty court records, ineffective assistance of counsel, and the trial courts failure to consider relevant law gain advantage for the state and affect the outcome of a fair trial?

Is an objection required before a court would have understanding that a detainee did not want to be tried after the time-line set in his involuntary removal initiated under article IV of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act?