No. 20-7570
David Travis Frazier v. Herbert H. Slatery, III, Attorney General of Tennessee, et al.
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appeals appellate-procedure civil-procedure due-process judicial-review limitations-period standing statutory-interpretation void-ab-initio void-judgment
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)
When a Court enters a judgment that is later determined to be void ab-initio, and a petitioner appeals from that decision, does that start the limitations period over, despite the finding that the judgments were void ab-initio?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
When a court enters a judgment that is later determined to be void ab-initio, and a petitioner appeals from that decision, does that start the limitations period over, despite the finding that the judgments were void ab-initio?
Docket Entries
2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-06
Waiver of right of respondent Herbert H. Slatery, III to respond filed.
2020-09-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)
Attorneys
David Travis Frazier
David T. Frazier — Petitioner
Herbert H. Slatery, III
Thomas Austin Watkins — Office of Tennessee Attorney General, Respondent
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent