No. 20-7548
David Antoine Luster v. Bradley M. Trate, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: administrative-law career-offender constitutional-law due-process judicial-review legal-precedent recidivism sentencing statutory-interpretation
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Question not identified.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the district court erred in concluding that the petitioner's prior conviction under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) was not a valid predicate offense for purposes of the career offender enhancement under the Sentencing Guidelines
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-03-30
Waiver of right of respondent Trate, Brad to respond filed.
2021-03-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)
Attorneys
David Luster
David Antoine Luster — Petitioner
Trate, Brad
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent