No. 20-7547
Saloman Martinez v. United States
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause constitutional-interpretation criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process evidence judicial-discretion kentucky-law sentencing-guidelines sixth-amendment standard-of-proof supreme-court-precedent
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
"VVvc G?ccoA * DecetuVi-er 11, Z02 -0
•\Vv£. uvu-V^A sAaFtS C^sAcnIcA' GoOfAr
Qa^ senA-e/vc-e\A} WArWfC
q^aOoa. roVi»Mj -\ o cx^<^■c \W, £ajz>\rec<\ OF Ren-VucKy Corv\/tcA cv©(rv
C©a^Y5 c\ O^r 'tVv^. Su^> 'Ce<M^e Ooik A £ precede aAs ^✓ 4? <£L # £?
tC^
(\) Cqmaj£6<A \J, UJasVvIrv^Aflfv^ 5 Ml l/,S- 3k (2ooq)®
(£) Xa J?* UtfAsAS-f, 3<H?
(mo). 3ss
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the defendant's conviction and sentence are in conflict with the Supreme Court's precedents in (1) Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36 (2004), and (2) In Re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970)
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Saloman Martinez
Saloman Martinez — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent