No. 20-753
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation v. Yakima County, Washington, et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: agency-deference consent criminal-jurisdiction federal-indian-law federal-jurisdiction indian-country indian-law public-law-280 public-safety retrocession statutory-interpretation tribal-sovereignty
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (from Petition)
Can the United States change the scope of its reassumption of Pub. L. 83-280 jurisdiction in Indian Country years after the reassumption became effective under 25 U.S.C. § 1323 without the Yakama Nation's prior consent required by 25 U.S.C. § 1326?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Can the United States change the scope of its reassumption of Pub. L. 83-280 jurisdiction in Indian Country years after the reassumption became effective under 25 U.S.C. § 1823 without the Yakama Nation's prior consent required by 25 U.S.C. § 1326?
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-12
Reply of petitioner Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation filed. (Distributed)
2021-02-26
Brief of respondents Yakima County, Washington, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-01-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 1, 2021.
2021-01-13
Motion to extend the time to file a response from January 15, 2021 to March 1, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2020-12-16
Response Requested. (Due January 15, 2021)
2020-12-09
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/8/2021.
2020-12-03
Waiver of right of respondent Yakima County, Washington, et al. to respond filed.
2020-11-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 31, 2020)
Attorneys
Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakama Nation
Ethan Andrew Jones — Yakama Nation Office of Legal Counsel, Petitioner
Yakima County, Washington, et al.
Kirk Andrew Ehlis — Menke Jackson Beyer, LLP, Respondent