No. 20-7525

Masao Kikuchi v. Catherine S. Bauman, Warden

Lower Court: Sixth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-23
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: administrative-law civil-rights constitutional-law constitutional-rights due-process federal-procedure habeas-corpus judicial-review parole parole-challenge standing substantive-due-process
Latest Conference: 2021-05-20
Question Presented (from Petition)

Does substantive due process protect inmates in parole process?

Is Sandin v. Conner, 518 U.S. 472 (1991) applicable to parole challenges?

Is Vitek v. Jones, 445 U.S. 480 (1980) applicable to parole challenges?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Does substantive due process protect inmates in parole process?

Docket Entries

2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-05
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2020-12-28
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Masao Kikuchi
Masao Kikuchi — Petitioner