Aimee Johnson v. St. Louis County Public Health & Human Services, et al.
Can a judge preside over a case when he or she is biased? Or when they are friends with the parties involved? Can a person have a fair trial when they had ineffective assistance of counsel?
Did the Trial Court error by not making sure good cause for termination was in the best interest of the children?
Did trial Court error when stated not in the best interest to terminate?
Did county fail to make reasonable efforts?
Did trial court error by not permitting timely motions to vacate out of tpr for fraud and extreme duress? Did trial court error on not telling parents they signed adoption consents? Did state Court wrongfully decide issues before it?
Did trial court error- failed to prove clear and convincing evidence that children were in need of protection or services pursuant to Minn statue 260.c0Q7subd 6?
Did both courts error not to void adoption contract for fraud?
Did district court error on civil rights were social workers deliberately fabricated evidence of child abuse, sexual abuse, and perjury to remove children?
Did district court error having case under advisement for a long period of time without setting adoption aside? Did district court error by dismissing this case? Did District court error by refusing to permit introduction or testimony concerning alleged fraud, duress and intimidation practiced upon them by adoptive parents, social workers, gal, and mother's attorney? Did all courts error on protecting special fundamental rights of the parents, civil & constitutional rights?
Did appellate Court error to not reverse adoption on the grounds of fraud? Did courts abuse their discretion to not send case for further review?
Can a judge preside over a case when he or she is biased? Or when they are friends with the parties involved? Can a person have a fair trial when they had ineffective assistance of counsel?