I, WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT RELIED ON CONTROLS TO DENY PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS AS LAWFUL EVIDENCE.

2. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT ERRED IN REVERSING THE DISTRICT COURT'S DECISION BASED ON SEPARATE AND DISTINCT GROUNDS THAT VIOLATED THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL AND CIRCUMSTANCES UPHOLDING THE FOURTH CIRCUIT'S DECISION THAT THE DISTRICT COURT VIOLATED THE PETITIONER'S RIGHT TO EFFECTIVE ASSISTANCE OF COUNSEL.

3. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS IN DENYING THE PETITIONER'S DECISION TO BE FREED AT SENTENCING WHICH WERE INCONSISTENT WITH PRIOR CIRCUIT PRECEDENT, AND WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION HAS CREATED A NEW STANDARD THAT THE PETITIONER IS NOT ENTITLED TO APPELLATE ATTORNEY ASSISTANCE UPHOLDING PREPARATION FOR TRIAL UNDER THE DISCOVERY OF THE CASE.

4. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ARBITRARY AND CAPRICIOUS IN DENYING THE PETITIONER'S DECISION TO BE FREED AT SENTENCING WHICH WERE INCONSISTENT WITH PRIOR CIRCUIT PRECEDENT, AND WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION HAS CREATED A NEW STANDARD THAT THE PETITIONER IS NOT ENTITLED TO APPELLATE ATTORNEY ASSISTANCE UPHOLDING PREPARATION FOR TRIAL UNDER THE DISCOVERY OF THE CASE.

5. WHETHER THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH CIRCUIT DECISION WAS ERRING NOT TO CERTIFY THAT THE FOURTH

Whether the Fourth Circuit decision was debatable not to review the merits of the claims