William Douglas Hampton v. Mark Williams, Warden
1) DOES 28 UNITED STATES CODE SERUICE $2LHI's.
SPECIFIC WORDING PERMIT THE JUDICIAL SUBMISSION AND CONSIDERATION
OFA HABEAS CORPUS IFTHE STATUTE'S SUBSECTIONS OF 1, 2, 3, 4, OR
AND 5 AT 28USCS 3224I(C) IS SATISFIED?
2) DOES 18.USCS & 225I(a)'s SpecifIC WOrdinG
REQUIRE THAT
. ANY UISUAL DEPICTION OF SUCH CONDUCT .
MUST.ALSO REQUIRE THAT. . .. . IF SUCH PERSON KNOWS. OR HAS REASON
H
TO KNOW THAT SUCH DEPICTION WILL BE TRANSPORTED OR TRANSMITTED
USING ANY MEANS OR FACILITY OF INTERSTATE OR FOREIGN COMMERCE.
TO SATISFY ThE STATUTE'S REACH FOR FEDERAL
OR MAILED,
PROSECUTION?
3) DoeS A PleA Agreement have identical
COnSTRAiNTS IMPOSED UPON IT AS dO CONTRACTS UnDeR COnGrESS
LEGISLATED CONTRACT LAW?
4) Does EuerY Defendant HAue the ConstItution
RIGHT tO HAUE A JURY deTERMIne OR DEFENDANT PLeAD GUILT tO EUERY
ELEMENT OF THE OFFENSE REGARDING A CRIMINAL ACT WHEN SUCH
i
1
1
ELEMenTS" SignIFiCAnTlY InCreAsE DeFendAnTs.
UNCONUICTED
•
SENTENCE
:
5) DOES A CONSUMER'S
1
FLOOR MODEL" RETAIL PURCHASE
REACH?
Does the specific wording of 18 USC § 2256(a) require that any 'visual depiction of such conduct' also require that the person knows or has reason to know that such depiction will be transported or transmitted using any means or facility of interstate or foreign commerce or mailed, thereby limiting the statute's reach for federal prosecution?