No. 20-7470
Pablo Ramon Guerrero v. Nevada
IFP
Tags: actual-innocence batson critical-stage cronic due-process fundamental-fairness mccollum presumed-prejudice strickland structural-error trial-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess HabeasCorpus JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)
1.) Whether a Brady/Giglio prosecutorial misconduct violation exists as a structural error, and if so, whether petitioner was denied a fundamentally fair trial as the error occurs during direct appeal; a critical stage.
b). Whether to in effect of a statute/Brady claim.
c). Whether Guerrero was denied a fundamental fairness at trial.
2) Whether a Petitioner invoking the actual innocence exception must follow Nevada disclosed evidence; or merely presented evidence in accordance with Schlup v. Delo, 513 U.S. 298 (1995).
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a Batson-McCollum proven violation qualifies as a structural error
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-01-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 15, 2021)
Attorneys
Pablo Ramon Guerrero
Pablo Ramon Guerrero — Petitioner