If the system does not provide adequate measures to address culpability, the injunctive rulings as to why; how: 'when entered ' manifest improper purpose to tamper with me presenting as witness to legal system to diminish by trickery my secured rights and privileges guarded by this court, in an act of retaliation meant to conceal misconduct of court and related officers ONLY by taking shield of 9+ million population to make them act against their own welfare [like my son by CNN, Arlington DHS, KIF, & UMFS, by Tort of Conversion - an act of fraud by misusing to make legal statements on helialf of 9+ million population involving minors without justification, consent, publication or notice affecting their secured rights, privileges, then the actions not to provide adequate measures constitute egregious abuse of discretion and office.

Arlington 's GDC judge Karen Hanenberg 's illegal 2/6/12 injunctive order moots itself nunc pro tunc in AppendixF pg s37-43 for (a) conflict because she initially presided over my divorce matters in Fairfax from 1997-2003, (b) in 2012 Arlington exceeding, lacking and unconstitutional jurisdiction that was of the Supreme Court 's designate judge only because opposing parties were public officers, and (c) any standing of Arlington assistant county attorney and AG 's civil litigation attorneys as petitioners. This action was mirrored in Jan & Mar 2019 by hon judge Ms. McCleanev in Fogg 's case from Richmond district court, bv hon judge Mr. Jenkins in 8&9& 12/19 from Richmond circuit; hon judge Mr. Hewitt in '15 Fredericksburg and hon judge Mr. Chuckers in '10 in Henrico.

QUESTION # 1 - This petition questions judge Hanenberg 's mental condition and why not be removed and barred from any government job of trust in any capacity whatsoever, to include from subbing DC courts or facilitating Virginia Supreme Court by masking her corrupt mind functioning, and apparent danger and threat to the public as a whole.

Under investigation by a special prosecutor, after CA Todder concluded "significant " conflict, serving DC <fc Virginia Supreme Court, on 2/6/12 judge Hanenberg extorted money for filing fees from me and never conducted a trial on the matters that were paid. Fraudulently entered injunctive order on 2/6/12 as bribe to people in her own field of profession without having jiuisdiction because of conflict with the defendants equally corrupt actors - Esther Wiggins, Jason McCandless, et al, authority of designate judge only from Supreme Court, that judge Hanenberg usurped by deceit, deception and exploitation of your petitioner without representation assaulting me from bench : "Don't say anything " In totality renders 2/6/12 order fraud nunc pro tunc for this court to unequivocally quash or command transfer, or remain for full trial.

QUESTION # 2 - Why this court must not grant exemplary damages of $9,000,000 fr om Karen Steel for destruction they put in motion actively contributed that my son and I face to date. Had she not tampered with us then, we would not have been destr oyed nor our lives at stake today by ABC/CNN/Ariington DHS 's RICO agents. She doesn't care for the public nor has any scant care for human life.

When I compared Mr. Fogg - my former employer, bad f

Whether the injunctive rulings manifest improper purpose to tamper with the petitioner presenting as a witness, diminish the petitioner's secured rights and privileges, and conceal misconduct of the court and related officers, constituting an egregious abuse of discretion and office