I.
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT AND THE TENTH CIRCUIT DECISIONS DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION IN MAYLE V. FELIX, 545 U.S. 644,664, 125 S.Ct. 2562, 162 L.ED.2d 582 (2005), WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DENYING PETITIONER THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROPERLY AMEND HIS BURRAGE V. UNITED STATES 571 U.S. 204, 134 S.Ct. 881, 887, 187 L.Ed.2d 715 (2014); AND THE PENAL DECISIONS DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION IN MILLER-EL V. COCKRELL, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003), WHEN THE TENTH CIRCUIT FAILED TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WHERE THE RECORDS AND FILES SUPPORTED THE FACTS THAT THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN NOT PERMITTING HIM TO AMEND HIS BURRAGE CLAIM UNDER FED.CIV. P. 15(c)(1)(B)?

II.
WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT AND THE TENTH CIRCUIT DECISIONS DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH THE DECISIONS OF THIS COURT IN MAYLE V. FELIX, 545 U.S. 644, 664, 125 S.Ct. 2562, 162 L.Ed.2d 582 (2005), WHEN THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN DENYING PETITIONER THE OPPORTUNITY TO PROPERLY AMEND HIS LAFLER V. COOPER, 566 U.S. 156, 163, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012); AND THE PENAL DECISION DIRECTLY CONFLICT WITH THE DECISION IN MILLER-EL V. COCKRELL, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003), WHEN THE TENTH CIRCUIT FAILED TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY WHERE THE RECORDS AND FILES SUPPORT THE FACTS THAT THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED IN NOT PERMITTING HIM TO AMEND HIS LAFLER CLAIM UNDER FED.R.CIV. P. 15(c)(1)(B)?

Whether the district court and the tenth circuit decisions conflict with the decisions of this court in Mayle v. Felix, when the district court erred in denying petitioner the opportunity to properly amend his Burrage v. United States and the penal decisions directly conflict with the decision in Miller-El v. Cockrell, when the tenth circuit failed to issue a certificate of appealability