No. 20-7433

Randy Philip Chaudron v. Texas

Lower Court: Texas
Docketed: 2021-03-11
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
IFP
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence identification law-enforcement-misconduct photo-lineup police-conduct witness-identification
Latest Conference: 2021-05-13
Question Presented (from Petition)

I. To THE DUE PROCESS CLAUSE VIOLATED WHEN TEAL COURT ALLOWED EVIDENCE, KNOWING THAT LAW ENFORCEMENT BROKE PROCEDURE OF ART. 3020 CP PHOTO LINEUP IDENTIFICATION BY CREATING A VERY SUGGESTIVE IDENTIFICATION BY SHOWING A PHOTO OF THE LINEUP?

II. IF DISPUTED FACTS RAISED BY THE EVIDENCE OF THE ACTUAL LEGALITY OF THE POLICE STOP ARE IN VIOLATION OF ART. 38-230) TEXAS CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE SHOULD A REQUESTED JURY

III. WOULDN'T IT BE LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A JURY ALLEGATION BY MEANS OF VERDICT OF THE? ONE WAS HURT OR EVEN PUT IN HANDS A MOTORVEHICLE IF NOT IN ANY WAY?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Due Process Clause was violated when the trial court allowed evidence, knowing that law enforcement broke the procedure of Art. 320 CP photo lineup identification by creating a suggestive identification

Docket Entries

2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2020-05-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Randy Philip Chaudron
Randy Philip Chaudron — Petitioner