No. 20-7425
Cornelius Kenyatta Craig v. Andre Matevousian, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: appellate-review constitutional-law criminal-conviction criminal-procedure double-jeopardy due-process fifth-amendment fourteenth-amendment reasonable-doubt sixth-circuit
Key Terms:
DueProcess
DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
1. Whether the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit pronouncement on the some evidence standard has departed from accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings nationwide?
2.) Whether the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP) created a liberty interest for Petitioner requiring due process protections under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the 'same evidence' standard for double jeopardy under the Fifth Amendment is unconstitutional as applied to the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-15
Waiver of right of respondent Andre Matevousian to respond filed.
2020-12-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Andre Matevousian
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Cornelius Kenyatta Craig
Cornelius Kenyatta Craig — Petitioner