No. 20-7422
Antuan V. Little v. Dan Cromwell
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 5th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights criminal-procedure due-process evidence evidentiary-standards legal-reliability witness-testimony
Key Terms:
Arbitration DueProcess Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration DueProcess Securities JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-04-01
Question Presented (from Petition)
Why Lrmé's TREM Counsel INEFFECmyg DN UES Frhuwee To Ch Marctner UC. Fol US TEsTOMOoNy ON THE "PRmR LUnrlomeul HUEGATIOS CE GEvErAL ASSMulT. pois LtiTec DENN Yue DLCESs WULE THE WWETNESS'S STATEMENTS AND TESreenovy ACE UnsreLDrate RDO BOhrer CO CvERCTON
Question Presented (AI Summary)
whether-the-witness's-statements-and-testimony-were-unreliable-due-to-coercion
Docket Entries
2021-04-05
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-17
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/1/2021.
2021-03-16
Waiver of right of respondent Dan Cromwell to respond filed.
2021-02-15
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 12, 2021)
Attorneys
Antuan Little
Antuan V. Little — Petitioner
Dan Cromwell
Daniel J. O'Brien — WI Department of Justice, Respondent