Could reasonable jurists debate whether the prosecution committed a Brady violation when it failed to disclose the prior victim's pubic hair found during DNA testing in a timely manner that would allow the defense to capitalize on its use?

II. Could reasonable jurists debate whether the trial court erred when it failed to instruct the jury that it should presume that the DNA testing on the pubic hair would have been unfavorable to the prosecution?

III. Could reasonable jurists differ with the district court's assessment that Petitioner's sentence violated the Eighth Amendment?

Could reasonable jurists debate whether the prosecution committed a Brady violation when it failed to disclose the prior victim's pubic hair found during DNA testing in a timely manner