No. 20-7384

Samuel Rasheen Rymond Toliver v. K. Adner

Lower Court: Second Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-09
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 1st-amendment 4th-amendment civil-rights constitutional-rights court-of-appeals due-process exhaustion-of-remedies first-amendment fourth-amendment free-speech solitary-confinement
Key Terms:
FourthAmendment FirstAmendment
Latest Conference: 2021-04-16
Question Presented (from Petition)

Was the treatmenttof the Petitioner on 5/30/17, being forced into Solitary Confinment for asserting his U.S.C.A. Const. First Amendment Unconsitutional? By Responents.

Was the Petitioner U.S-C.A. Const. Fourth Amendment not honored or defend 'by the Court of Appeals/Lower Federal Courts?

Was Both courts decisions erroneous are in conflict with other appellant courts directly related to exhaustion of remedies trial cases?

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Was the treatment of the Petitioner on 5/30/17, being forced into Solitary Confinement for asserting his U.S.C.A. Const. First Amendment Unconstitutional? Was the Petitioner U.S.C.A. Const. Fourth Amendment not honored or defended by the Court of Appeals/Lower Federal Courts? Were Both courts' decisions erroneous and in conflict with other appellate courts directly related to exhaustion of remedies trial cases?

Docket Entries

2021-08-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-05-10
Petition for Rehearing filed.
Main Document
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent K. Adner to respond filed.
Main Document
2021-02-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 8, 2021)
Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma PauperisPetitionAppendix

Attorneys

K. Adner
Sarah Lily Rosenbluth — New York State Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Samuel Toliver
Samuel R. Toliver — Petitioner