No. 20-7374

Demitrius Wayne Alexander v. Joseph Headley, Warden, et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-10
Status: Denied
Type: IFP
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: 4th-amendment criminal-procedure due-process ineffective-assistance-of-counsel right-to-counsel search-and-seizure
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2021-04-30
Question Presented (from Petition)

whether both state and Federal Courts rulings were in error when evidence search and seizure was used against Petitioner Demitrins wayne Alexander during trial ?

whether both state and Federal Courts were in error for denying petitioner Alexander post.conviction relief Conin pue that Alexander's trial counsel was Not ineffective for failing to obtain a firearm witness to investigate expert forensics and pursue reasonable defense bates

Are both state Rule 3z conrts Fed. District and Appeals and decisions in petitioner connts Demitrins Alexander's case with this Honorable in conflict in sases yons Conrt's decisions Mapp v. Ohio, Strickland se V washington,etc.

whether the U.S. Court of Appeals for the eleventh circvit was in error

Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the state and federal courts erred when evidence obtained from an unconstitutional search and seizure was used against petitioner Demetrius Wayne Miranda

Docket Entries

2021-05-03
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-15
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/30/2021.
2021-04-09
Waiver of right of respondent Joseph Headley, Warden, et al. to respond filed.
2021-01-06
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Demitrius Wayne Alexander
Demitrius Wayne Alexander — Petitioner
Joseph Headley, Warden, et al.
Michael Anthony NunnelleyAlabama Attorney General's Office, Respondent