Sherwood Laran Bostic v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al.
DueProcess FourthAmendment HabeasCorpus
DID THE U.S. CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL ERR WHEN IT DENIED (COA)
S B B P B B B Y PS
WHEN IT SUSTAINED THAT PETITIONER HAS NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT
TO COUNSEL IN HIS STATE POST CONVICTION EVIDENTIARY HEARING.
DID THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEAL ERR WHEN IT DENIED (COA)
STATUS ON THE POINT RAISED, THAT THE U.S. DISTRICT ABUSED ITS
DISCRETION BY NOT GRANTING HIS FEDERAL HABEAS CORPUS 28
U.S.C. 2254, UNDER SLACK V. MCDANIEL, 529 U.S. 473 (2000)?
Did the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeal err when it denied (COA) status on the point raised that the U.S. District Court erred when it sustained that petitioner has no constitutional right to counsel in his state post-conviction evidentiary hearing?