I. Whether, in a case where the jury question was whether Petitioner acted with extreme indifference to the value of human life when she made a driving error, the trial court violated Petitioner's right to a meaningful opportunity to present a complete defense by excluding evidence that others also made the same driving error.

II. Whether the rule of Ramos v. Louisiana, holding that a non-unanimous jury requirement violates the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, applies retroactively to cases on collateral review.

Whether the trial court violated the petitioner's right to present a complete defense