Did the Utah Supreme Court commit fraud by stating The Framers rights were desired by and Rodelph requested, and by stating Three Tiered banner Violate Double Jeopardy notwith standing the acquittal of the predicate offense?

Did the Utah Supreme Court abuse its discretion, requested "CAPPO" and Liberty, per FOS "ZO LUA ZB" Court stated "The dgnsfeh Mion wired FOS OvNSe} 04 ete, real Mekiskle v. Wi49) ne antisee ales FarcHav. Cal, tr. ord the Uta Pe rane laarl shite Te, Jothtirev+l Coury 3 c SC. Statin the Soanseriph vocre' dostiy di Vidlativn 93 VSIC. &IEDI and bol trRey vin pid the Utah Sop rem c lovyt ab vse its a diseretion &s per lootey. and Letle fart Acshev Suenso by WV, Caw Pearle as wes! the th Amend mcrts dou ble cop ond collateral aslo p psi ing that he C30 pp iabs- net isa Fh 3 in ray y] a Ge dicate StPense. lid nef Canshia a Foy ble jegp 27y violation?

Does this pollen bF ¢ on duct Consh te ppud vpon the Lovrl as per Ohdv Fah man vB , Gonzalesylacshy, "Bollochy Us. Wathlin)?

Did the Utah Supreme Court commit error by stating the Franses' rights were not violated and Rodolph requested, and by stating three flawed reasons for denying the Franses' double jeopardy claim?