ARIZONA DISTRIET COUNTS DISMISSAL OF DAUIS' SI983 CIVIL- AETIN,
CIRCUIT POURE OF APPEALS DECISIONS ON THE SAME .POMSTITUTIONALLY IMPORTANT MATTER?
) DOES THENINTH CIRCUIT COULT OF APPEALS
AND THE ARIZONA
DISTFIET COURT RULINES VIOLATE DAVIS
AND 1YTH
AMENDMENT GUARANTEED RIGHT TO DUE FROCESS OF THE
LAW BY DEPRIVING THE FETITIONER THE OFPORTUNITY TO SEEK
RESOLUTION ANC ADJUDIEATION IN HIS S IGS3 CIVIL ACTION WHERE
A PERSON OR PERSONS ALTINE UNOER THE COLOR OF STATE LAW
HAS DENIED DAUIS HIS DUE PEOCESS RIGHT S.ESTABLISHED BY
THE U. S. CONSTITUTION AND FEDERAL LAW?
DID THE ARIZONA STATE CUURTS ABUGE THEIR JUDICIAL-D/SCRETION
BY REFUSING TO APPLY SOME FORM OF CORREUTWE MOCESS.WHERE
DAUIS RAIGED CLAIMS THAT EONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS HKS CAUSED
OAVS' PONTINVED ILLEGAL DETENTION IN PONTCRUENES OF. THE
STH AND IYTH AMENDMENT GUARANTEED RIGNT TO DUE PNOLESS OF
THE LAW?

Whether the district court erred in dismissing the petitioner's claims