No. 20-7343
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: confrontation-clause criminal-procedure cross-examination due-process evidence hearsay sixth-amendment standard-of-review witness-testimony
Latest Conference:
2021-04-16
Question Presented (from Petition)
Why was I denied the right to cross-examine my accused attacker, thereby violating my Sixth Amendment right "the accused shall enjoy the right to be confronted with witnesses against him"?
Did the violation of my trial time true?
How credible are the witnesses?
Did the wisdom of a clear look at the injured eyes, if dark during the time of the incident?
Did the witness identify Justin Williams as Aaron called as a witness?
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the court of appeals erred in its admission of the father's 911 call under the excited utterance exception to the hearsay rule
Docket Entries
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-25
Waiver of right of respondent Utah to respond filed.
2020-12-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Justin David Williams
Justin David Williams — Petitioner
Utah
Marian Decker — Utah Attorney General's Office, Respondent