No. 20-7331
Kevin L. Martin v. Frank Vanihel, Warden
Response WaivedIFP
Tags: actual-innocence civil-rights constitutional-claim district-court due-process habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel medical-care prison-conditions procedural-default
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-04-23
Question Presented (from Petition)
Whether the state failed to disclose exculpatory evidence in violation of Brady v. United States.
Whether petitioner's request for counsel was ineffective, failing to prove state constitutional violations.
Whether a fundamental miscarriage of justice occurred, such that the procedural default can be excused and the court should require an actual prejudice exception.
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the state failed to provide the inmate with the necessary medical care and treatment as required, violating his constitutional rights
Docket Entries
2021-04-26
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/23/2021.
2021-04-06
Waiver of right of respondent Frank Vanihel, Warden to respond filed.
2021-01-26
Petition for a writ of certiorari and motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis filed. (Response due April 5, 2021)
Attorneys
Frank Vanihel, Warden
Stephen R. Creason — Respondent
Kevin Martin
Kevin L. Martin — Petitioner